THE LEFTIST TOWER OF BABEL

Prime Minister of England, David Cameron spoke HERE - Article by John Frickethis past weekend on the detriments of "multiculturalism," which again reminds me of the American "Melting Pot" vs. the Tower of Babel. His speech comes on the heels of Germany's Prime Minister, Angela Merkel, who last year said something similar. Europe is suffering from the consequences of their own Socialist lab experiment where academics thought it would be just dandy to incorporate Muslims into the European societies.

In the above mentioned article, Mr. Fricke astutely points out: "The left assigns moral equivalence to all cultures in a common cause attempt to seek socialist control of populations regardless of the nature of any totalitarian rule. The left's socialist goals require all sorts of catalysts, even those that are at odds with the left's stated platform of inclusion. In reality the only inclusion the left desires is that all people be controlled by a central government." and "But the real goal is not to use multiculturalism to encourage living separate lives, but in fact to encourage the death of traditional cultures and to ensure that destruction by attacking and demonizing the pillars of European and American society."

In years past America has been referred to, quaintly, as a "Melting Pot." Anyone who has ever put together a good pot of stew knows that the ingredients come together to create one cohesive entity. Blending for the sake of one. They would also know that some ingredients do not compliment others and must, by virtue of a discriminating palate, be left out of the stew, i.e. you don't put lime juice into a beef stew. E Pluribus Unum. Not so for "multicuralists." Multicuralists want you to think that a cohesive society can be achieved without the "melting." The academic multicuralist lab experiment is used by Socialists to facilitate the breakdown of America's laws and traditions. (as has been witnessed in Europe) That is all it is. It is being used as a stepping stone toward the ultimate goal of a Socialist Tower of Babel. In order to get there, they must first tear down individual countries, their identities, and there sovereignty. Notice, instead of celebrating America, Obama has spent his entire presidency apologizing for being American, apologizing for America. Tear it down first...."transform" America. Into what? Was anyone asking?

The Tower of Babel was a creation of a leader named Nimrod to unite the entire world. God said this would not do and struck it down. (Why do you think "Nimrod" today is an name indicating stupidity?) He, God, sent the people out to scatter into separate languages and cultures / countries where they would thrive better and within their own individual characteristics. America, while referred to as a "Melting Pot" is one of those separate countries with a distinct culture and language. But global socialists want to build a Tower of Babel, linking the entire world with "universal rights," among other things. Think the song "We Are the World" as just one pop culture item of indoctrination. No, we are NOT the world. We are Americans. We were a "Melting Pot." Now we are supposed to be some area of land made up of isolated cultures who do not mix with each other, nor compliment the whole of the stew. Multiculturalism has no commonality with a nation. It's like separate tribal states, such as exists in the very disjointed areas of Africa where war between tribes exists all the time. No cohesiveness. Constant struggles for power. Constant conflict. Which is pretty much what is being set up in Europe and in the U.S.

Muslims and Socialists seem to have decided they have a common enemy. The enemy for them is Christian and Jewish, is a capitalist, and someone who believes in the rule of American law. In the combined efforts of Muslims and Socialists, they would create a global Tower of Babel, where all peoples are enlisted to build a world wide society based on the tenets totalitarianism. Totalitarianism is what Muslims and Socialists have in common, besides the hate for Christians and Jews that is. The commonality between Muslims and Socialists is not all inclusive and eventually the Socialists and Muslims will turn on each other for power. In the interim, we are going to be facing war with Muslims for the unforeseeable future.

But for the sake of the Socialists' stepping stones, who better to facilitate the rise of a Muslim Caliphate but an American president whose father was a Muslim and is a Muslim sympathizer? How does America fight an enemy when the President of the United States does not acknowledge the threat. (Jimmy Carter redux on steroids.....see previous post)

As we are watching Egypt fall into the hands of the Muslim Brotherhood and their Socialist buddies, we are witnessing the rise of a Muslim Caliphate where "all others" will be conscripted into servitude or destroyed by the Muslims. Muslims don't believe in individual rights. Period. The Muslim way is a theocracy built on some misguided superiority complex, and if you don't tow the line, you will be murdered. Muslims don't believe in "multicuralism." So if you think this rise of the Muslim Caliphate is going to result in peace between the Socialists and the Muslims, just wait for the fireworks to start on that score.

Meanwhile, it looks like the Prime Ministers Cameron and Merkel have just begun to see what Europe has wrought by inviting millions of Muslims into their midst. I fear this is a day late and a dollar short. How will they rid themselves now of the enemy withing their borders? And worse for us, the United States has adopted a laissez faire attitude toward the Muslim immigrations policies here. Oh, sure....just come on in and begin the rot and corruption of America. It might take you a hundred years...but oh, what the hell...you'll get there eventually.

Unless and until, the United States and Europe recognize the enemy that the Muslim Brotherhood represents, and the enemy that Multiculturalism of Socialists represents, we will be fighting wars and suffering the consequences of the Socialist Tower of Babel.


Right Track Article on Multiculturalism "People, consider the story of the Tower of Babel in the Bible. Whether you believe the story or not, the moral is that even then different languages caused people to separate into distinct groups. These different languages caused different cultures to develop, and that’s good. What’s not good is when one culture intrudes upon another, refuses to assimilate, and demands that the host culture accomodate the intruder’s intrusiveness."

KUDZU, THE ASIAN CARP, AND THE CORDOBA MOSQUE

Multi-cultural and diversity are the group think buzz words of the day.  In fact, the government is so busy forcing multi-culturalism and diversity, you would think that those are the most important sociological tenets ever dreamed up by the genius of man.  Sociology used to be the study of societies.  Now it has become social engineering of societies through the force of governments.  Strange things happen when men force incompatible groups together.  Like putting alligators in a room filled with puppies.  Diversity becomes a nightmare.  Predatory instincts are not to be denied, yet social engineers keep insisting on putting predators in the room with likely victims.

What, in heaven's name, do Kudzu and Asian Carp have to do with the Cordoba Mosque, you may be asking?  The tags multi-cultural and diversity assume compatibility.  That assumption is, as my Dad would say, making an ass out of U and Me. 

In our local area we fight Kudzu vines every year which are voraciously eating up fields and trees.  Initially it was thought that introducing Kudzu into the U.S. would be a good thing.  

 US Forest Service Site:

Description: Kudzu, a perennial vine native to Japan and China, was first introduced into the USA in 1876 and was actively promoted by the government as a "wonderplant", It expanded to cover over 1 million hardwoods by 1946 and well over 2 million hardwoods today. When Kudzu invades a forest, it prevents the growth of young hardwoods and kills off other plants. Kudzu causes damage to powerlines, and even overwhelms homes, Kudzu has invaded important protected areas, requiring significant investment of management resources, The management response to date outside the protected areas has been insufficient to deal with this very significant threat.

 How did Asian carp get so close to the Great Lakes?

Two species of Asian carp -- the bighead and silver -- were imported by catfish farmers in the 1970's to remove algae and suspended matter out of their ponds. During large floods in the early 1990s, many of the catfish farm ponds overflowed their banks, and the Asian carp were released into local waterways in the Mississippi River basin.

The carp have steadily made their way northward up the Mississippi, becoming the most abundant species in some areas of the River.

Chicago Area waterways map showing location of carp barrier (Illustration courtesy of Phil Moy, University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Institute)

The Chicago Sanitary and Ship Canal, where the barrier is being constructed, connects the Mississippi River to the Great Lakes via the Illinois River.

Asian carp, which have steadily moved toward Chicago since the 1990s, present a challenge for scientists and fish biologists. The fish are aggressive eaters, consuming as much as 40 percent of their body weight a day in plankton, and frequently beat out native fish for food, threatening those populations.

 

Asian Carp Czar Named 

On a conference call today with Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin and other congressional leaders, President Obama’s Council on Environmental Quality announced the selection of John Goss to lead the near $80 million, multi-pronged federal attack against Asian carp.

 Untold millions of dollars are spent on defending our country against predators.  Be they plants, fish, or people, we are having to use our resources to fight off continuing attacks from incompatible entities that were mistakenly introduced into our society out of naiveté.  We used to have an immigration policy that was protective of the United States interests.  All bets are off now.  Now the elites think you can introduce anyone and anything into our environment without consequences.  That is naive and dangerous.  How many billions have been spent over the last two decades trying to fend off or appease the Muslim culture?  How many of our soldiers have died while liberating Muslims from their own ill-made circumstances?  

The Cordoba Mosque in NYC is a perfect example of what is not at all compatible with our culture.  In fact, religious freedom is being used to introduce an incompatible, I would say predatory, group of people into our society.  Muslims are not compatible with the American system of government.  Muslims desire to have their Sharia laws become the laws of our land.  They are insistent upon implementing those laws.  Their "holy book" tells them it is perfectly acceptable to lie and deceive in order to gain their ends.  The Imam Rauf pushing this mosque is stating, unequivocally, a threat that the mosque will be built in the Ground Zero location or heads will roll.  He is saying the Koran burning demonstration in Florida will bring attacks.  Paraphrasing there, but you get the picture.  What about that is compatible with our American way of life?  What is being set up is a moral conflict between America and Islam, which is exactly what radical Muslims want.  Is our plan to just nicely and politely invite them?  "Sure, come on in."  Do puppies invite alligators into the room?  Imam Rauf is demanding they walk right in ....or what? Threats and more threats.

The best of intentions are the road to hell, as the saying goes.  It is inviting disaster to try to incorporate an incompatible society into our own.  Suicidal.