INVASION OF THE BODY SNATCHERS - EUGENICS AND FOUR YEAR OLDS

How many ways can the statists take away your life and liberty?  

At this point it is becoming harder and harder to count them all.  From healthcare to education, from housing to food, the Federal government, under the dictatorship of Barack Obama, is in the process of taking everything in your life out of your hands.

Now Barack Obama wants four year old children in government run preschools. Universal pre-school for all!   Body snatching four year old children? Well, I think we've been there and done that, except Head Start was voluntary.  Well, voluntary to those who took their children there, but not to those of us who paid for it.  Even the word "voluntary" is so carelessly tossed around and ambiguous these days.  "Voluntary" is just another word for taking from some and handing it over to others.  Choices are so restricted that there is actually a phrase to describe that now.  It's called "Choice Editing."    

I have read that the "Affordable Health Care Act" contains language to allow the state to demand your organs upon your death without your consent.  Not at all sure that is so, but if Mayor Bloomberg can mandate what you can't buy to drink and can restrict the use of salt, is there any limit to what the government can and can't do with your body?  Obamacare (the unaffordable health care act) is chock full of assaults on a person owning his or her own body.  The "Independent Payment Advisory Board" is due to be the appointed cabal who decides your fate.  They are just another version of body snatchers. 

And who decides the fate of a four year old?  Parents or the almighty state?  If Barack Obama has his way, it will be the state.  The few short years that parents have to hold their children dearly and tightly, to protect them and shelter them, teaching them the uncompromising love of parents, would be cut short yet another year by the dictator in the White House. Obviously this is Hitler's and also the Soviet Marxist imperative, to take the children as quickly away from parents as possible and hand them over to the state.  My dear God, this is America!  How can anyone let this already, nearly complete, socialist / fascist doctrine  Socialist / Fascist doctrine continue?  How?  Why?  And now Eric Holder, the Joker of Justice, has chimed in to say that parents have no fundamental right to educate their own children? 

Most educated people are aware that since ancient Greece, with the philosophy of Plato, there have been statists who declare you only exist for the sake of the state.  This arrogant ideology only comes from those who believe they are immune from the declarations they make, never having to submit to the rules they put on others.  (Bloomberg and Gore would be two very fine examples of this.  George Bernard Shaw would be so proud of them.)  I can't imagine that they imagine they would ever be forced to do without whatever they wish or have someone else decide their fate.  No.  The rules they make are always for the poor unfortunate souls they denigrate as not worthy of liberty to choose a fate for themselves.  

Bill Wilson for Net Right Daily

Obama claimed that "fewer than three in ten 4-year-olds are enrolled" in a preschool program. So now he wants enrollment to become universal.

It harkens back Plato's Republic, which advocated children be mandatorily placed in the care of the state guardians at very young ages.

Except, right after his big speech, the White House contradicted Obama by suggesting that only families up to 200 percent of the poverty level instead of the current 130 percent would even qualify for his Head Start expansion.

Not exactly universal. But it will still end up costing billions more every year.

So Barack Obama thinks parents should hand over their children at four years old so that he and the statists can mold those children into good little slaves of the state.  And further, costing all of us billions more in taxation.   As usual, there is never enough to satisfy their appetite for power or your money.  K through 12 is obviously just not long enough for the Federal government to control the outcome of that child's life.  Why not just birth that baby and hand it over immediately to the state nursing agency where they will either keep the child or get rid of it, depending on the acceptable DNA results? 

You know it's coming.  You see it as plain as day, just like the sun coming up in the East.  The body snatchers are very busy planning your future.

(Just as a side note, I think it fascinating that each time a compassionate God inspired event or ideology appears, shortly thereafter an equally non-compassionate, cruel ideology of tyranny rears its ugly head.  I suppose this is the moral tug of war for the history of the world...the war of good vs. evil, no doubt.  But soon after Hippocrates penned his Hippocratic philosophy of compassionate care of the sick and infirm, along came Plato with just the opposite view. That is just one example of this constant dichotomy presented to humanity.) 

JOHN KERRY SLAPS HIS OWN FACE

 Sometimes the irony is just too delicious.  John Kerry spoke out yesterday and, by his statement, proved how Obama got elected.  Below is the quote:

John Kerry quote yesterday from the Boston Herald “We have an electorate that doesn’t always pay that much attention to what’s going on so people are influenced by a simple slogan rather than the facts or the truth or what’s happening,” Kerry told reporters after touring the Boston Medical Center yesterday.

Out of the mouth of a cynical elistist leftist, this quote made me stop, drop, and roll on the floor with laughter.  Senator Kerry just described the exact playbook by the leftists in government and the press.  But, Senator Kerry is referring to whom in this quote?  According to the Boston Herald article, he is referring to the angry voters connected to the Tea Party activists and the Republicans who are responding to citizens who are fed up.  Senator Kerry further states, “I think a lot of the anger today - while it’s appropriate because Washington is broken - is not directed at the right people,” said Kerry. “Barney is prepared, as others are, to explain what we’re doing. I think when people hear the facts and they see what we’re doing, it frankly makes sense.”  

Sure, Senator Kerry, people out here are just tickled pink with 14 Trillion in debt and the Obama administration nationalizing car companies, student loans, banking, medical care,  and a national unemployment rate of 10%+, etc.  Really?  Sure, Senator Kerry, people are just hopping around with glee at Barney Frank's massive fraud with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.  Absolutely, Senator Kerry, let's hear how Barney Frank spins the Community Reinvestment Act implosion into a "good thing" for the country.  

Senator Kerry says, "people are influenced by a single slogan rather than the facts or truth or what's happening."  You mean slogans like, "Yes We Can?"  Slogans like, "Hope and Change?"  Slogans like, "Change we can believe in?"  Would you, Senator Kerry,  say the national media outlets, the press, the journalists who are supposed to be the government watchdogs gave us facts and truth regarding Obama? 

In each joke there is a grain of truth that makes people laugh.  After my fit of laughter subsided, I had to ponder the grain of truth in Senator Kerry's statement.  The grain of truth in Senator Kerry's statement is that the electorate has been uninformed and duped by a conniving and sinister government and colluding press operatives.  That was the plan.  Evidently it worked in 2008.  And now that the public has awakened to the propaganda so smoothly put in place by the elitist left, the patriotic tea party citizens are basically telling John Kerry and everyone else in government to go fly a kite.  He doesn't like it that the tables are turning away from his favor?  

The public is going around the national media outlets for information, going outside of the government for analysis of government activities.  The public is clammoring for facts and truth.  And it isn't going to be Barney Frank's spin or John (Teresa Heinz) Kerry's duplicitous pandering that people swallow. 

NOT AS DUMB AS YOU THINK, MR. BROOKS

David Brooks reveals his disdain for most Americans in this NYTimes op-ed.

It is important when developing your opinions to gather facts and expose your mind to what others have concluded. I highly recommend you read this David Brooks' op-ed so you may gain insight to the superiority complex that so afflicts the political left in this country. Sometimes I wonder about the psychology of people who gravitate to and define the left, i.e. how on earth do they arrive at such lofty opinions of themselves and demand that everyone else is just stupid?

I found the answer some months ago. It's called the Dunning-Kruger effect:
Definition on Wikepedia

The Dunning–Kruger effect is a cognitive bias in which "people reach erroneous conclusions and make unfortunate choices but their incompetence robs them of the metacognitive ability to realize it".[1] The unskilled therefore suffer from illusory superiority, rating their own ability as above average, much higher than actuality; by contrast the highly skilled underrate their abilities, suffering from illusory inferiority. This leads to a perverse result where less competent people will rate their own ability higher than more competent people. It also explains why actual competence may weaken self-confidence because competent individuals falsely assume that others have an equivalent understanding. "Thus, the miscalibration of the incompetent stems from an error about the self, whereas the miscalibration of the highly competent stems from an error about others."[1]

So, those who disagree with Mr. Brooks on the policies and role of government are not the 'educated class?' Hmmmm....let me see what he means by that.

This is my "educated opinion" of what he means. As an example of what our higher educational institutions are teaching American students, Bill Ayers has been implanted into the higher educational class studies in universities to convince the students that Marxism is the preferred method of governing the masses. What Mr. Brooks means is that Walter E. Williams and Thomas Sowell are not part of the "educated class." Indeed, he is asserting that anyone who disagrees with the oh, so, sophisticated minds coming out of left-leaning universities is just dumber than dumb. What he means is that life experience and common sense are not regarded as enlightened education. What he means is that the Yalies, the Ivy Leaguers, the Harvard grads, are the educated elite and should have dominion over the lowly masses. What he means is that believing in the U.S. Constitution as originally written is just so plebeian and not worthy of consideration as highly educated premise. Mr. Brooks' psychological ploy in his article is the premise that if you side with the left, you must be 'educated.' If you don't, you must be ignorant. My take on that is this; if you fall for his clever ploy, you really are stupid.

Here is the rub. There are uneducated people in this country. There are people who have been indoctrinated, but not educated, in the American public school system since the Federal government began mandating curriculum. There are people who have slipped through the cracks and have been told that the government is their only savior. It is these people the political elite have targeted to be the voting block. The more of these they can create, the more votes they get. (This is why the next big push from the left is amnesty for illegals...mostly uneducated people with no history of American loyalty or understanding of the Constitution......perfect foils for the left.)

Mr. Brooks and his ilk would like to forget and marginalize the rest of America. The middle class in America, especially those over the age of 40 have been educated in the fundamentals of American government. They are not stupid. And they are not deaf, dumb, and blind. The middle class built the country through their energy, creativity, and their strong faith in the U.S. Constitution. These are the "Tea Party" people that Mr. Brooks defines thusly:

"The tea party movement is a large, fractious confederation of Americans who are defined by what they are against. They are against the concentrated power of the educated class. They believe big government, big business, big media and the affluent professionals are merging to form self-serving oligarchy — with bloated government, unsustainable deficits, high taxes and intrusive regulation."

Well, for Mr. Brooks' education, I would point out to him that the tenets he just attributed to the Tea Partiers are the tenets of the United States Constitution. And you would be "educated" to know that. The Constitution is against the "concentrated" power of any elite class and especially elitists operating in the Federal Government. He tries to get around this by implying the "uneducated" are against the "educated." Bunk, Mr. Brooks. Oligarchy is not what our republic was created to support. The Tea Party movement is defined by what they are for, i.e. small government, balanced and restrained budgets, low taxes, and liberty for all......might I add, equal justice....NOT "social justice."

Nice try Mr. Brooks.....we are not as dumb as you think.