Thursday, September 27, 2012


I received a communication yesterday from a man who lives in Mitchell County, North Carolina.  I feel compelled to share it with you all.  He said:

    Hello Cheryl, I just read your Agenda 21 speech - impressive! We too live in North Carolina, in Mitchell County near the headwaters of the Catawba River and we are very concerned about Agenda 21 spin offs where we live. Lately there has been a tremendous influx of progressives into the county and they have been making their voices heard. We now have a View Tax which I am looking into so that we can petition a repeal.

The location he mentions is at the northern edge of the State of North Carolina.  The "View Tax" of which he speaks is a cute little add on to property taxes, taking money from property owners based on the view from their property.  Property that used to be assessed by some monetary figure of building value or market value is now being taxed based on the view?  Yep.  You read that right.  This tax is being added as an extra line item on tax forms. 

Looking into this, I found an article on this tax in New Hampshire.  It says:

  David Bischoff, chairman of the Board of Selectman in Orford, is one of those people.

Bischoff owns a one-room cabin with no electricity, no running water, no phone service, and no driveway. In his case, the "view factor" led to a property valuation of over $200,000 by state property assessors. He will likely be billed $4,000 a year for property taxes on a cabin that cost only $9,000 to build. 

Too bad, citizen.  Because New Hampshire tax assessors have also discovered the “view factor,” the view TAX.  Simply put, they take the normative property value and move the tax assessment way on up just because you have that view.  Some towns now even have separate lines on the appraisal records for the view.

In one case reported by the Associated Press, “the view added $140,000 to [the] property’s underlying value of $22,900.  The property owner’s taxes are thus expected “to jump from less than $500 last year to more than $3,000 this year.”  That’s not an incremental tax increase.  That assesses a subjective “view” at six times the value of the property, from one year to the next.

So, what is going on here?  Suddenly people are being punished because their property has a view of something and, therefore, must have a separate tax to justify owning it?  Property taxes used to be figured by the building cost and the market value of the property.  Can't have that, now can we?  We must have something for bureaucrats to do, so we'll allow them to ponder the tax value of a view.  Surely that will pay for quite a few of their salaries, eh?

Oh, but wait!  In looking around for information on this I came across some history and a possible source for this madness.  It seems this has been going on in the U.K. for quite some time.  Not only a view tax, but a partial view tax, a patio tax, an off street parking tax, a balcony tax, a garden tax, and more.  You'll have to see it to believe it.

Well, you know if Europe does it, we are not far behind.  Thought we fought a revolution to remove ourselves from their tyranny. 

Here is a bit of trivia for you From the Daily Mail

In 1696 the Government introduced the Window Tax - a property was taxed according to the number of windows it had. The tax, which was eventually repealed in 1851, was hugely unpopular.

To reduce their tax burden some would brick up their windows - we can still see this legacy today on some of the architecture from the period - and the origins of the term ‘Daylight Robbery’ are thought to originate from this tax.

People who produce nothing only know how to steal money from others.  Try to tell them no and they throw tantrums and call you names...and send in the taxman with armed forces to collect. We really are feeding a Socialist beast here in Amerika these days. Under Obama this beast has gotten very very fat.  Obesity is a problem alright.  It's government obesity that is the problem. 

Funny thing is, the money ran out a long time ago.  $16 Trillion ago, actually.  That didn't matter...the beast must be fed....which then makes the government come after you to pay for the feast.

Wednesday, September 26, 2012


I've been busy working here, still against that cute little Agenda 21 regional structure called "Sustainable Communities Initiative."  The County vote is tomorrow evening.  At this point, I think I have done all I can do....alerting Commissioners, getting info for them, relaying info from other elected officials in other cities, gathering support from citizens, published an op-ed in the paper.....all I can do.  So we will see what happens.  Just praying for enlightened, strong Commissioners.  Hope they don't fail us.

So onto Clinton, aka Slick Willie. His wife is no better, in fact maybe worse.  But ole Bill always gets a pass and lots of idolizing from all directions. Is anyone watching what this grinning Cheshire Cat is doing?  I've been sick to see the praise he gets.  And even Romney accepted the invitation to speak at Clinton's Global Initiative (CGI) Conference, which of course takes place the same time as the UN convenes Heads of State.  This way he can grab all of them.  Romney's speech gave me pause, to say the least.  Supporting the Global Socialists with Clinton at the helm should worry every American.   Fox News Transcript here

The CGI is Global for a reason.  Clinton has the same egotistical desire to mold the earth into his own image as Obama has.   And the image is Fabian Socialism, have no doubts.  Both of them will use whatever tools to take down America, be it fascism or outright socialism.
Here you will see the incredible power behind Bill and Hillary Clinton on this extensive 49 page list . For example, on the list are many of the world’s most powerful media representatives, bankers, the Rothschilds etc. There are well over a thousand leading individuals on the list that are secretly funding and supporting the Clintons.

And Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar for a reason.  The Rhodes Scholarship, set up by the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, is to further the cause of global socialism on behalf of the wealthy who get to rule and enjoy all of the resources they deny to others. All Rhodes Scholars have to show promise of that goal in order to qualify.  Nice.

CGI has "TRACKS" to accomplish its goals, published on the website here.
The "tracks" miss nothing in managing everyone's everyday life.  Here is a list of them:
The Built Environment
Education and Workforce
Energy and Ecosystems
Girls and Women
Global Health
Market-based Responses
Response and Resilience - Emergency Relief

Gee, that's funny.  It looks a lot like Agenda 21.  Wonder why....
Here is a quote from the site, "In the CGI community, today’s foremost thinkers meet tomorrow’s groundbreaking solutions. Thought leaders and visionaries push the conversation forward,"

There we are with those "Thought leaders" and "Visionaries" again.  

If you want to know what the Clintons believe in collusion with the UN, here is a synopsis:
  • The redistribution of human and financial resources (through migration, a global economy and a global welfare system).
  • A uniform worldwide education system that would standardize both social "learning" and work skills everywhere.
  • Control of the mainstream media and other propaganda channels. Professor Carrol Quigley wrote in Tragedy and Hope,

"There grew up in the 20th century a power structure between London and New York which penetrated deeply into university life, the press, and the practice of foreign policy. The American branch of this 'English Establishment' exerted much of its influence through five American newspapers (New York Times and Herald Tribune, Christian Science Monitor, Washington Post...) [4.Quigley, 953]

  • A supportive "civil society" (including business, community groups, the news and entertainment media, churches, etc) prepared to lead the masses toward cultural and religious synthesis in communities and organizations around the world using the dialectic process -- a strategy well tested and proven in the former Soviet Union. (Many participants -- including churches -- may never know how their new business practices and small group dialogues help undermine traditional values and prepare their members for the new global society.)

By the way, there is a "visionary" named Zelda who holds a spot at the Cleveland County Fair, if you'd like to have her give you "visions."  (Took that joke from a dear friend of mine...thought you would like it. He actually told one of our County Commissioners he'd buy him a ticket to go see Zelda if he wanted "visions!!"....don't you love it???)
In New York this week....with the UN...Bill Clinton and world leaders planning your life and mine.  Constitution?  What Constitution?

I love America.  These are tragic days to witness.  To think anyone, let alone Mitt Romney, in this country would praise the twisted, sick minds of the Clintons is enough to send us all to Zelda for help.  Instead, I pray to God for help to defeat His enemies and our nation's enemies.

Wednesday, September 19, 2012


So the polls are supposedly still close.  And in a lot (most) of media polls Romney is still behind Obama.  But everyone I read on the web, hear, or talk to, other than the most die hard Obamanuts, are chomping at the bit to get to the polls to vote for Romney and get the O out of our White House.  I'm in a swing state, North Carolina.  And I will grant that I don't travel in left-wing circles.  In fact, I made haste away from the liberals and looneys in the Art Guild to which I used to belong for the very fact I could no longer support the anti-American bias in all they were doing.  Hanging out with enemies of the Republic was not my idea of creating beautiful art.

Maybe I'm seeing things through my own prism, but tonight I just realized what these polls are really about.  You have to think 5 steps ahead of yourself and do some "outside of the box" cogitating to keep up with the diabolical schemes of the leftists.  Think about this:  You, the left-wing media, tell everyone that Obama is ahead and is going to win this election.  You keep that message playing over and over again for months leading up to the election.  Then, when the O loses, what do your followers think?  Why, they think all kinds of things.  They think they were entitled to winning because that is what they've been told all these months.  They think they were cheated.  They accuse everyone of fraud.  They scream and holler, "Foul!" Let the riots and lawsuits begin!  Bring on the Director Holder of the  DOJ.  You know...that guy who defends Al Qaeda terrorists and the New Black Panthers, but prosecutes Gibson Guitars over some foreign nation's laws.

The polls, they say, are close, even while reporting Obama ahead.  That keeps people on their toes.  That keeps the apathy down.  If you think your guy is going to take it in a landslide, you don't want to say that because people will take it for granted and stay home.  So you keep reporting the race is close albeit ahead for your guy.  Now you might accuse the Romney campaign of that feint, but I don't think the media is doing that for Romney.  Nah.  The media is in the tank for the O.  So that he is ahead, but not too too far ahead.  Just enough to convince people to still go to vote.  Nevertheless, the expectation is set that the O will win.

The only reason I can think of for the polls being so weird is that the Obamanuts are being set up for outrageous and incendiary reactions.  Just my opinion.

Maybe I've been reading too much about Francis Fox Piven or Saul Alinksy.  What do you think?

Tuesday, September 18, 2012


Instead of planning their own lives, central planners plan every other person's life.  They are meddlers.  Unaccomplished at any other various skills, as we have seen with Barack Obama, they thrive on parasitic behaviors and controls that inflate their egos.  It is what they live to do. They can't leave well enough alone because leaving well enough alone would give them nothing to do.  They don't know how to do anything else well enough to survive.  Think about that.  If you put Barack Obama on the street to fend for himself, what would he do?  He'd hustle.  He'd scam.  He'd sell himself as a visionary.  I doubt seriously if he could ever do anything as menial as flipping a burger or washing a dish.  His ego would not let him, for one thing.  He'd last about 5 minutes before throwing a fit about how beneath him those jobs might be.

Today it struck me that is at the heart of all of the chaos brought by Progressives in government.  Someone has misled these people to think they are brilliant, when in fact they are lacking in basic intelligence.  The tragedy is that the world is covered up with these manipulators.  All of their existence is based on theories of anti-reality, such as Rousseau, Hegel, Marx, et al.  And now we witness the "New Middle East" brought to us by global planners who are using the American people for their end goals of destabilizing the Middle East for an end game I can only guess has something to do with controlling the area for its resources.

The "New Middle East" is a theory developed by some globalist think tanks made of people such as I just described.  These are the same people bringing us the "New World Order."  And... no tin foil hat is needed to see this manifesting right in front of our eyes.  The Council on Foreign Relations has been pushing for this "New Middle East" since Jimmy Carter had the White House...and we all know how well that turned out. 

Here is a take on the Syrian situation, February of this year, from Pravda  

"This has been falsely portrayed to the Western public as a political revolution crushed in blood by a ruthless dictatorship. Of course, this lie has not been universally accepted. Russia, China and the Latin American and Caribbean member states of ALBA repudiate it. They each have a historical background that allows them to readily grasp what is at stake. The Russians are thinking of Chechnya, the Chinese of Xinjiang, and the Latin Americans of Cuba and Nicaragua. In all these cases, beyond ideological or religious appearances, the methods of destabilization by the CIA were the same."

My next question is this:  Are we now going to fight a proxy war with Russia over Syria?  Are we already doing so?   It is so painfully obvious that the CIA, with direction and aid from the State Department, has been fomenting this Arab Spring for quite some time already....and without real knowledge of American citizens.  How many more good Americans will die to continue this plan for global re-alignment?  I do assume several in Congress have known this all along.  I also assume Americans have been kept in the dark on the ruse of "security."   The spin from media is breathtaking, so outrageous and false.  The pitiful joke from the Obama administration about some ridiculous film being responsible for American embassies being attack is beyond laughable.  The insult is that Americans are that stupid. 

Let's face it.  The game plan is to erase national sovereignty in the Middle East and create a "region" under rule.  And if you think that is such a great idea, ask yourself whose national sovereignty is next.  If we can accommodate globalists' interventions all over the world just to sate some globalist agenda, do you honestly think that ends with our nation intact?  If you think that, you haven't been watching millions of illegals pouring into the U.S. with no Federal protection.  

There is a plan afoot.  We just don't know what it is or where it is taking us.  What we do know is that it has everything to do with global regionalism and a disappearing United States of America.  And what we do know is that our government no longer works for us but for some invisible hands who have made a plan for us.

Is this New Middle East a plan Americans believe in?  Is this a plan of common dreams of the American people?  (Hardly.  Most Americans are not even slightly aware of this plan, although surely Americans have to be asking themselves why we are shedding blood for Islam and nations who hate us.)  Granting there are resources in that area, is this plan a manifestation of Neo-Colonialism?  And is that something Americans are willing to place their sons and daughters lives at risk to support? 

No going back now.  They broke it....we own it.

Hat tips:
This announcement was a confirmation of an Anglo-American-Israeli “military roadmap” in the Middle East. This project, which has been in the  planning stages for several years, consists in creating an arc of instability, chaos, and violence extending from Lebanon, Palestine, and Syria to Iraq, the Persian Gulf, Iran, and the borders of NATO-garrisoned Afghanistan.

Secretary Condoleezza Rice stated during a press conference that “[w]hat we’re seeing here [in regards to the destruction of Lebanon and the Israeli attacks on Lebanon], in a sense, is the growing—the ‘birth pangs’—of a ‘New Middle East’ and whatever we do we [meaning the United States] have to be certain that we’re pushing forward to the New Middle East [and] not going back to the old one.”
The Map of the “New Middle East”
A relatively unknown map of the Middle East, NATO-garrisoned Afghanistan, and Pakistan has been circulating around strategic, governmental, NATO, policy and military circles since mid-2006. It has been causally allowed to surface in public, maybe in an attempt to build consensus and to slowly prepare the general public for possible, maybe even cataclysmic, changes in the Middle East. This is a map of a redrawn and restructured Middle East identified as the “New Middle East.”

"But Paul Pillar, a former top CIA Middle East analyst now at Georgetown University, warned against US efforts to try to “stage-manage the emergence of a new political order and picking winners and losers in it,” noting that Washington’s last effort to do so – in Iraq – “should have taught us how dim would be the prospects for success…”
The map the Pentagon wants to see in the Middle East would leave Syria without access to the oil-rich Mediterranean Sea, and with the goal of redirecting oil flows to China and Europe, researcher William F. Engdahl told RT.
­Engdahl says the Arab Spring in general is a well-planned, long-term project aimed at regime change in the Islamic world. And looking at the aftermath of the Arab Spring revolutions, it is anarchy instead of democracy that was successfully achieved.

Wednesday, September 12, 2012


Today we have a dead American ambassador to Libya.  Three others ..... dead Americans in Libya.  All for the sake of some supposed democratic revolution across the middle east.  Well, when you install Christian hating and American hating Muslims in a "democratic" environment, what do you get?  Murder and mayhem.  None of this is about freedom.  It is about creating a Caliphate based on Islam which is sworn to annihilate Western Civilization.  

How stupid are we?  Jimmy Carter lost Iran in 1979.  His ineffectual, convoluted foreign policy made no sense and ended up with the radical Islamic revolution there.  Here is a little reminder:
"And what of Iran and the Carter administration’s response to the Shah’s difficulties? After the Shah left Teheran in January 1979, he is reported to have remained convinced for weeks that the American government all along had a grand strategy that was simply beyond his ken. Given Iran’s and the Gulf’s strategic importance to the West, given the steady support by five previous American administrations, perhaps President Carter simply had reasoned that the Shah was expendable and a new stable, pro-West civilian regime was required. Or maybe Mr. Carter had decided to seek an alliance with radical Muslim nationalists in the area dedicated to igniting dissidence inside the Soviet Union’s central Asian republics. What the Shah could not believe was that no plan no strategic objective existed in Washington. Yet as events revealed, that in essence was what lay behind the administration’s response to the crisis in the Gulf. When on 23 January 1980, a year after the Shah had left Iran, eighty days after the humiliating imprisonment of American officials in Teheran, and a month after Soviet tanks had garrisoned Kabul, President Carter announced his containment doctrine, the world was surprised, as was the Shah."

The result of that fiasco has been years of threats and fear.  Now we have an Iran threatening nuclear weapons and wiping Israel off the face of the earth as soon as they can. And now we have Barack Obama smacking his lips over Muslim domination in all of the middle east.  Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are propping up Islamics with our tax dollars. We paid for arms to throw out the only halfway stable (albeit ugly) regimes in the region.  What are we facing now?  Gee, do you think Obama and Clinton knew what they were doing?  I do.  I absolutely think they knew exactly what they were doing. 

How long does it take to charge and convict a President with treason?  As long as it took to find and kill Bin Laden?  If ever?  

This afternoon I am hearing that the video that was supposedly the catalyst for this murder, has nothing to do with it.  That these murders were pay back on 9-11 for killing Bin Laden.  What makes more sense...retribution on 9-11 for finally killing Bin Laden?  Or a stupid video?  If you pick the video, think about why they blame that video.  How do you shut down free speech?  Blame a video.  Then, if you are in the enemy camp, you can justify giving yourself more power to shut down free speech. Voilá!!

Now Hillary Clinton comes out and condemns the murder of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya.  Sure.  We really believe you, Hillary. Especially after you issued a statement of apology for "hurting Muslims' feelings," an apology based on a video that few people had seen. You, with the close executive assistant whose family is high ranking Muslim Brotherhood.  Sure.  
What will it take for Americans who ascribe to the Democrat Party to realize their party is in bed with enemies of the United States of America?  What will it take for those same Democrats to realize their party is an enemy of the United States of America?  What does it take to make people realize that appeasing murderous and mostly insane enemies is not a defense strategy?  What is it about "Kill the infidels" that Obama and Clinton don't understand? 

Hat tip: Breitbart


Saturday, September 8, 2012


A friend of mine told me the other day that she is tired of "playing defense."  She asked me, "When do we get to go on offense?"  The conversation reminded me of an old high school cheer from football games...."HOLD THAT LINE" ....shouted over and over to the defensive players to keep the opposing team from scoring.   Does it seem to you that the Constitutionalists (Tea Partiers, Conservatives et al) are stuck on playing defense all of the time?

I told her I thought that is our role.  You see we aren't the ones trying to forcefully impose our will on others.  We are the ones trying to stop the force of government from imposing unconstitutional impositions on all of us.  Obama complains that to him the Constitution is made of "negative" liberties."  He wants to create the rules and not be held back by limits.  Protecting liberty is a defensive position.  It is a line in the sand.  It is saying to collectivists, "No, you can't steal from others to redistribute wealth to those who don't earn it."  Obama and his cronies don't agree.

It does seem that we are always yelling, "NO!"  "STOP THAT!"  Which is where the leftists get the idea to call Republicans "the Party of No."  The Constitutional limits of government are well laid out for us to follow.  It's just that leftists (Using that word today to include Democrats, Socialists, Communists, Fascists, and all subterranean versions of these.) don't understand limits.  Give them a rule to limit their reach into someone's wallet and they will spend the rest of their lives trying to get around it.  Tell them they can't take someone's property away to suit their collectivist schemes, and they will make up horror stories to justify the taking anyway.  Tell them the Constitution does not allow them to forcefully take money from a Church or unwilling Christian to pay for abortions, and they say, "Oh, yes we can," and then proceed to enact laws to do just that.  

And there you are...Obama's theme chant, "Yes we can!"  While we are saying, "No, you shall not," because "you are not allowed to do that under the rules of the U.S. Constitution.  Now it is "Forward!"  I think that is what so many people missed the first go 'round with this guy.  They heard, "Yes we can," and misinterpreted that to mean, "The first black guy can be President and isn't that grand!"  Most people (obviously speaking generically here) just weren't hearing his real message which was: "Yes, I can do anything I want and the Constitution be damned."   The underlying theme of that, the theme that most Americans wanted to hear, was that blacks can be rulers and not the downtrodden slaves of white masters.  Holy frijolés if affirmative action didn't already give them more advantages than whites for decades?  This was the racist assertion that Americans got sucked into in that 2008 election, never even looking at the policies B.O. was intending to force down our throats.

As I watched the DNC in Charlotte this past week, I kept thinking how cloaked the language was.  No one seems to care what "Forward" means.  Just like no one cared what Hope and Change actually represented in 2008.  It just sounds nice.

The slogan “Forward!” reflected the conviction of European Marxists and radicals that their movements reflected the march of history, which would move forward past capitalism and into socialism and communism.
Vladimir Lenin founded the publication “Vpered” (the Russian word for “forward”) in 1905. Soviet propaganda film-maker Dziga Vertov made a documentary whose title is sometimes translated as “Forward, Soviet” (though also and more literally as “Stride, Soviet”).
 I've been reading a biography of Alger Hiss that recounts the Communist infiltration of our government and universities during the 1930's, '40's, and 50's.  It was a walk in the park for the Soviets and American Communist allies.  The Roosevelt "New Dealers" were all Communist leaning ideologues.   Hiss and many of these people came walking into high government positions straight out of Harvard, Columbia, and other supposedly respected universities.  The recruiters were active in those universities, picking out the students and post-graduate interns who were sympathetic to the cause.  And by the way, these folks had connections to print media like crazy during those days, which is another reason McCarthy was and still is smeared by media.  (Since then, the media has continually been involved in selling Communism, with cloaked and perfumed language here in America.)  While a generation has passed, I believe these and other universities devise the rotten core of where Communist ideology is fostered in our nation.  Look at Clinton, Bush, Obama and ask yourself how did they get into power?  (All Harvard and Columbia)  Most of the Hiss generation Communists were law graduates (lawyers) - a la both Clintons and both Obamas.  (Which may be why Clint Eastwood said he never thought it was a good idea to have lawyers in the White House.)  We know today that most colleges and universities are selling leftist rubbish to the students.   It may be that there are not the underground Communists in positions in these universities. today.  Today they don't have to be underground....just blatantly selling anti-American rotgut to our youth.  What was subversive then, is now right out in the open, in your face, total acceptance of Communism in academia.  (note Hilary Clinton's thesis in tribute to Alinsky.) 

When I heard Bill Clinton at the DNC offer up a huge slam at American independence by saying, " If you want 'You're on your own' government, you should vote for Romney,"  I thought, "Wow this guy wants a nation of dependent sheep!"  I also thought, "This is straight out of Lenin's notebook!" 

Back to the original premise here....are we always going to play defense against the left's collectivists schemes?  I think so for now.  They are coming at us, pushing through us, shoving us down, running over us, and generally putting us in the position of defense.  I'm not sure if that will ever change.  They can come up with slogans to sway the stupid all day long.  It is up to us to "HOLD THAT LINE," until people stop being this interminably stupid.  And at this point, that seems to be a long way off!''

How do you tell people, "No, we do not want to move forward?" ??  That is how clever they are.  To use a word that means something good to people, when in fact their policies are backward and tyrannical....that is their forté, i.e. twisting words to mean the exact opposite of what they are doing.  The most modern, forward thinking, and successful nation in the world is being taken down by stupidity and sweet sounding, lying words, while those of us who love and rely on the Constitution are saying, "HOLD THAT LINE!" 

(To my friend who I love and admire, I'm still thinking about what you said.)

Thursday, September 6, 2012


"When we vote in this election, we'll be deciding what kind of country we want to live in."

(That's all I could find."  Thanks for stopping by!)
Ben Shapiro, writing for Breitbart's Big Government evidently heard what I heard out of Clinton's lying mouth.  Here is his take on it. 

Wednesday, September 5, 2012


As the nation was trying to get a handle on the Republican ticket, Obama signed yet another executive order to choke off your energy use.  Last Thursday, as Romney and Ryan were accepting the nomination of the Republican Party, Barack Obama did it again.  The guy can't help it.  He is a relentless obsessive / compulsive have to give him credit for that.

The order, which aims to increase the number of cogeneration plants in the U.S. by 50 percent by 2020 and slash carbon emissions by 150 million tons per year, is the administration’s latest effort to “deploy cleaner and more efficient energy production in the country by working around political resistance to climate change and ‘green’ energy legislation on Capitol Hill,” Reuters reports.

Notice the words, "working around political resistance to climate change and green energy."  C'mon, folks.  How long does it take to figure out what these jerks are doing to us?  Political resistance?  I wish we had "political resistance."  Where is that?  I don't see people standing up to this imperial tyrant.  Do you?  Congress?  What Congress?  Do we even have that anymore?   

No one with half a brain believes the climate change lies anymore.  And everyone with half a brain knows "green energy" is a bank busting failure and not worth one taxpayer penny spent for wind or solar. And yet we see press release after press release that our nation is borrowing more money for "green energy."  Political resistance? Where is it?    
And as Bill Clinton takes the stage tonight at the DNC, I am reminded of the executive order he signed creating the "President's Council on Sustainable Development."  To be honest, the public was out of the loop on that one.  Who knew?  Well, now we do know and we don't want that either, thank you very much.  How much damage can these guys do with executive orders?  Billions?  Try Trillions!  

Yep, 20,000 people crowding into the Bobcat Arena in Charlotte tonight to watch the Clinton buffoon pat himself on the back, all the while his nice little executive order still picks the pockets of every American for a lying boondoggle of an unconstitutional scam. The Clinton buffoon will slightly nod to the O racketeer who doubled down on the "President's Council on Sustainable Development" by creating another executive order establishing a partnership between HUD, DOT, and the EPA called "Sustainable Communities Initiative."  Two peas in a pod, these two shysters.  Soaking you and smiling to the crowds at the same time.

Adding icing to the moronic cake, the Democrat National Platform includes this lovely tribute to "Environmental Justice."  Breitbart reports:

“We know that global climate change is one of the biggest threats of this generation – an economic, environmental, and national security catastrophe in the making,” the platform reads. “We affirm the science of climate change, commit to significantly reducing the pollution that causes climate change, and know we have to meet this challenge by driving smart policies that lead to greater growth in clean energy generation and result in a range of economic and social benefits.”
According to the platform, climate change also disproportionately impacts the poor and thus more commitments to “environmental justice” are needed.

Political resistance?  Bring it on.  I haven't seen it yet.

Still waiting.


Sunday, September 2, 2012


It pains me greatly to have this macabre DNC theatre beginning this week in what used to be a Southern jewel of a city.  But it is what it is.   So let's see what this production is promoting so far.

The star of the show, the protagonist if you will, is a man who refuses to take responsibility for any detrimental result of his own policies.  He is a hero in his own mind.   He lives in a world where everyone around him tells him he is golden.  His greatest talent is tooting his own horn.  If someone were to tell him he is a lackluster ne'r-do-well, good for nothing, blowhard, what would he do?  How would he react?  If someone asked him to give a truthful accounting of the results of his actions, what would he say?  We know what he says.  He knows how to spin.  That is what he does.....spin and lie.  That is what serves as leadership in his mind.  And the media spins and lies right along with him. 

I will never believe he is the innocent bystander to the destruction of our nation, as he would have you believe.  He may be a narcissist, but he isn't completely stupid.  He knows what he is doing to the nation.  He can laugh off the critics even if they are correct.  Why?  Because this destruction is deliberate.  You don't get the joke?  The ideology he represents was meant to do exactly what has happened.  Taking America down.  Debt and unemployment, leviathan government, unelected bureaucratic rule.  These are all his intentions.  Can he say that out loud?  Of course not.  He only knows how to tell you how great he is and how great he will be...IF he only gets another 4 yrs. to complete his job.   

As you look at the line up of other "stars" showing up in Charlotte for the DNC, you will see a gamut of other ideologues who hate America.  Then there are the naive sycophants who think this lying President IS America.  Bill Clinton giving a keynote speech is like having Lenin show up to support Stalin.  (Just ignore the rigor mortis.)  Hip hip hooray for Marxism!!  Let's tell everyone what a great plan it is!!  And by the way, your mode of transportation to get to this play is light rail, tiny electric cars, or bicycle.....or you can get there on foot.  (Stars take planes and limos.)   

Cameo appearances by the likes of Sandra Fluke add luster to the ideas that everyone should pay for all others' sexual preferences, no matter how odd they are.  LGBT'ers will be highlighted for comic relief.  Jimmy Carter comes to lend an elderly crutch for all the failed policies of past communist presidents.  Really.  (We could add a tribute to Woodrow Wilson, FDR, and the rest of the Progressive Democrats here.)  What does Carter add?  Carter did his part to wreck both the economic strength (see Community Reinvestment Act)  and the military strength of the nation (see removing the Shah of Iran in order to prop up the Muslim Caliphate). Musical headliners like Jeff Bridges and James Taylor are showing up to sing for their masters.  Brad Pitt will show up, just to be seen.  It's all so very cliché and predictable. 

The show starts tomorrow.  Leave your mind at the door and just go with flow.  It's bound to be quite a fantasy trip!