WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT OUR LEADERSHIP?

 Has righteous indignation made a comeback?  If so, hallelujah!  It's about time. 

I was just reading an article about NHS in Britain regarding denying health care.  The writer made the correlation between NHS and Obamacare's Independent Payment Advisory Board. NHS Plays God  What struck me was the cold and calculating disengagement from individual needs and precious life.  The Progressives in leadership positions are hell bent for "denying" care, defense, or any actions supporting life.  What struck me is how much like the Benghazi situation the Obamacare set up is.  How so?  Denial of help and care to save lives.  There is a common thread. 

Last night I heard a caller on the Jason Lewis Show (radio) say that "Obama could have eaten a live baby during the debates, and the press would not report it and cover for him."  I thought that sounded about right.   I just read someone commenting on another blog that "Hillary could have taken a gun and shot our people in Benghazi herself and she would walk away unscathed, being untouchable by the press." I thought that sounds about right, too.

Today we hear that the King of New York City, Mayor Bloomberg finds the NYC Marathon event more important for generator use than helping the people suffering from Hurricane Sandy just a mile or two away.  Maybe just blocks away.  The stories of suffering in the area are becoming really dire. He is denying help to the suffering in order to promote the NYC Marathon.  BUT, Bloomberg today is all to deliriously happy to endorse Obama for a second term as President.  (and there is the exact reason I have not donated to the Republican Party in years...refusing to support RINO's such as the King of New York City.) 

Money and power have trumped caring for our fellow human beings.  Welcome to Fabian Socialism, a la George Bernard Shaw from the last century.... and Ted Turner, currently, who says it's a good thing that our soldiers are committing suicide. 

Are you as outraged as I am? 

Image below is a Benghazi time line of pleas for help and the actions of our dear leaders. Actually, it is too small here to read, so click on the link and go to Director Blue to read through it. 

Benghazi Time Line from Director Blue

CARTER REVISITED - ONLY WORSE

Today we have a dead American ambassador to Libya.  Three others ..... dead Americans in Libya.  All for the sake of some supposed democratic revolution across the middle east.  Well, when you install Christian hating and American hating Muslims in a "democratic" environment, what do you get?  Murder and mayhem.  None of this is about freedom.  It is about creating a Caliphate based on Islam which is sworn to annihilate Western Civilization.  

How stupid are we?  Jimmy Carter lost Iran in 1979.  His ineffectual, convoluted foreign policy made no sense and ended up with the radical Islamic revolution there.  Here is a little reminder:

Airpower Chronicles from Australia

"And what of Iran and the Carter administration’s response to the Shah’s difficulties? After the Shah left Teheran in January 1979, he is reported to have remained convinced for weeks that the American government all along had a grand strategy that was simply beyond his ken. Given Iran’s and the Gulf’s strategic importance to the West, given the steady support by five previous American administrations, perhaps President Carter simply had reasoned that the Shah was expendable and a new stable, pro-West civilian regime was required. Or maybe Mr. Carter had decided to seek an alliance with radical Muslim nationalists in the area dedicated to igniting dissidence inside the Soviet Union’s central Asian republics. What the Shah could not believe was that no plan no strategic objective existed in Washington. Yet as events revealed, that in essence was what lay behind the administration’s response to the crisis in the Gulf. When on 23 January 1980, a year after the Shah had left Iran, eighty days after the humiliating imprisonment of American officials in Teheran, and a month after Soviet tanks had garrisoned Kabul, President Carter announced his containment doctrine, the world was surprised, as was the Shah."

The result of that fiasco has been years of threats and fear.  Now we have an Iran threatening nuclear weapons and wiping Israel off the face of the earth as soon as they can. And now we have Barack Obama smacking his lips over Muslim domination in all of the middle east.  Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton are propping up Islamics with our tax dollars. We paid for arms to throw out the only halfway stable (albeit ugly) regimes in the region.  What are we facing now?  Gee, do you think Obama and Clinton knew what they were doing?  I do.  I absolutely think they knew exactly what they were doing. 

How long does it take to charge and convict a President with treason?  As long as it took to find and kill Bin Laden?  If ever?  

This afternoon I am hearing that the video that was supposedly the catalyst for this murder, has nothing to do with it.  That these murders were pay back on 9-11 for killing Bin Laden.  What makes more sense...retribution on 9-11 for finally killing Bin Laden?  Or a stupid video?  If you pick the video, think about why they blame that video.  How do you shut down free speech?  Blame a video.  Then, if you are in the enemy camp, you can justify giving yourself more power to shut down free speech. Voilá!!

Now Hillary Clinton comes out and condemns the murder of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya.  Sure.  We really believe you, Hillary. Especially after you issued a statement of apology for "hurting Muslims' feelings," an apology based on a video that few people had seen. You, with the close executive assistant whose family is high ranking Muslim Brotherhood.  Sure.  

 

What will it take for Americans who ascribe to the Democrat Party to realize their party is in bed with enemies of the United States of America?  What will it take for those same Democrats to realize their party is an enemy of the United States of America?  What does it take to make people realize that appeasing murderous and mostly insane enemies is not a defense strategy?  What is it about "Kill the infidels" that Obama and Clinton don't understand? 

Hat tip: Breitbart